Search for: All records

Abstract This study describes results from video observations of five intracloud flashes located ≤ 20 km from the camera and recorded with 6.1 µs exposure time and 6.66 µs frame intervals. Video data are supported with electric field change (E-change) and VHF measurements, with emphasis on the flash initiating event (IE) and initial breakdown (IB) stage. In four of the five flashes, the IE is accompanied by weak luminosity, ≤ 5% above background, lasting for 300–500 µs. Two of these four IEs were positive Narrow Bipolar Events (NBEs) with VHF powers of 43 and 990 W; these are the first (known) data showing visible light detected with a positive NBE. Two other IEs with weak luminosity had powers of 0.5 and 1 W, and the IE with no detected luminosity had a VHF power of 3 W. A typical IB cluster consists of several narrow pulses and one classic pulse in E-change data (along with many VHF pulses), and each example flash has 2–10 IB clusters in the first 5–50 ms. The luminosity of IB clusters was substantially greater than IE luminosity, ranging from 10 to 40% above background in four examples, while for one flash with 10 IB clusters, the luminosity range was 35–360% above background (average 190%). Luminosity durations of IB clusters were 520–1750 µs with average 1210 µs. For both IEs and IB clusters, increases in the detected luminosity were closely timed with substantial VHF emissions and decreased when VHF emissions weakened. 

Abstract Time-correlated high-speed video and electric field change data for 139 natural, negative cloud-to-ground (CG)-lightning flashes reveal 615 return strokes (RSs) and 29 upward-illumination (UI)-type strokes. Among 121 multi-stroke flashes, 56% visibly connected to more than one ground location for either a RS or UI-type stroke. The number of separate ground-stroke connection locations per CG flash averaged 1.74, with maximum 6. This study examines the 88 subsequent strokes that involved a subsequent stepped leader (SSL), either reaching ground or intercepting a former leader to ground, in 61 flashes. Two basic modes by which these SSLs begin are described and are termed dart - then - stepped leaders herein. One inception mode occurs when a dart leader deflects from the prior main channel and begins propagating as a stepped leader to ground. In these ‘divert’ mode cases, the relevant interstroke time from the prior RS in the channel to the SSL inception from that path is long, ranging from 105 to 204 ms in four visible cases. The alternative mode of SSL inception occurs when a dart leader reaches the end of a prior unsuccessful branch—of an earlier competing dart leader, stepped leader, or initial leader—then begins advancing as a stepped leader toward ground. In this more common ‘branch’ mode (85% of visible cases), there may be no portion of the subsequent RS channel that is shared with a prior RS channel. These two inception modes, and variations among them, can occur in different subsequent strokes of the same flash. 

Based on experimental results of recent years, this article presents a qualitative description of a possible mechanism (termed the Mechanism) covering the main stages of lightning initiation, starting before and including the initiating event, followed by the initial electric field change (IEC), followed by the first few initial breakdown pulses (IBPs). The Mechanism assumes initiation occurs in a region of ~1 km³with average electric fieldE > 0.3 MV/(m·atm), which contains, because of turbulence, numerous small “E_thvolumes” of ~10⁻⁴–10⁻³ m³withE ≥ 3 MV/(m·atm). The Mechanism allows for lightning initiation by either of two observed types of events: a high‐power, very high frequency (VHF) event such as a Narrow Bipolar Event or a weak VHF event. According to the Mechanism, both types of initiating events are caused by a group of relativistic runaway electron avalanche particles (where the initial electrons are secondary particles of an extensive air shower) passing through manyE_thvolumes, thereby causing the nearly simultaneous launching of many positive streamer flashes. Due to ionization‐heating instability, unusual plasma formations (UPFs) appear along the streamers' trajectories. These UPFs combine into three‐dimensional (3‐D) networks of hot plasma channels during the IEC, resulting in its observed weak current flow. The subsequent development and combination of two (or more) of these 3‐D networks of hot plasma channels then causes the first IBP. Each subsequent IBP is caused when another 3‐D network of hot plasma channels combines with the chain of networks caused by earlier IBPs.

 

High‐speed video and electric field change data are used to describe the first 5 ms of a negative cloud‐to‐ground flash. These observations reveal an evolution in character of the luminosity and electric field change pulses as two branches of the leader separately transition from initial leader to propagating as a negative stepped leader (SL). For the first time reported, there is evidence of weak luminosity coincident with the initiating event, a weak bipolar pulse 60 μs prior to the first initial breakdown (IB) pulse. During the IB stage, the initial leader advances intermittently at intervals of 100–280 μs, in separate light bursts that are bright for a few 20‐μs frames and are time coincident with IB pulses. In the intervals between IB pulses, the initial leader is dim or invisible during the earliest 1.8 ms. Within 2 ms, the leader propagation begins transitioning to an early SL phase, in which the leader tip advances at more regular intervals of 40–80 μs during relatively dim and brief steps which are coincident with SL pulses having short duration, small amplitude, and typically unipolar waveform. These data indicate that when the entire initial leader length behind the lower end begins to remain illuminated between bursts, the propagation mode changes from IB bursts to SL steps, and the IB stage ends. The results support a hypothesis that the early initial leader development occurs in the absence of a continuously hot channel, thus the initial leader propagation is physically unlike the self‐propagating SL advance.

 

The properties of the first 5–12 classic initial breakdown pulses (IBPs) of three cloud‐to‐ground (CG) lightning flashes were determined using a modified transmission line model. As part of the modeling, the current with respect to time of each IBP was determined from the measured electric field changes at multiple sites using three theoretical methods called Hilbert transform, Hertzian dipole, and matrix inversion. In the transmission line modeling the length of each IBP was estimated from high‐speed video data of the IBPs. The modeling provided the following properties of the larger classic IBPs in each flash: peak current, velocity, total charge, charge moment, radiated power, and total energy dissipated for successive IB pulses in three developing lightning flashes. For the main initial leader channel in the three CG flashes (and for one long branch), IBP peak current was largest for the first or second classic IBP and declined mostly monotonically with successive IBPs. For the same channels, IBP current velocity was smallest for the first classic IBP and increased mostly monotonically with successive IBPs. The smallest velocities were (2.0, 2.5, 2.5, 3.0) × 10⁷m/s, respectively, while the largest velocities were (9.2, 12.2, 11.5, 12.0) × 10⁷m/s, respectively. These data support earlier hypotheses that it is the classic IB pulses during initial leader of normal negative CG flashes that change the nonconductive air into an ionized path that is sufficiently long and conductive to start the stepped leader.

 

This study describes a new method for modeling the radiated electric field (E) of initial breakdown pulses (IBPs) of lightning flashes. Similar to some previous models, it is assumed thatEpulses are caused by a current propagating along a vertical path, and an equation based on Maxwell's equations is used to determineEdue to the current. A matrix inversion technique is used with the IBP radiation term ofEto determine the IBP current waveform directly from far‐fieldEmeasurements rather than assuming a parameterized current waveform and searching for appropriate parameters. This technique is developed and applied to observations of six previously modeled IBPs. Compared to the prior modeling, this matrix inversion method gives significantly better results, based on calculated IBP goodness of fit to the originalEdata. In addition, this model can match IBP subpulses along with representing the overall bipolar IBP waveform. This method should be useful for studying IBPs because once the IBP current is known, one can calculate other physical parameters of IBPs, such as charge moment change, total charge moved, and total power radiated. Thus, the more realistic IBP current waveform determined by this technique may offer new clues about the physical mechanism causing IBPs.